Avançar para o conteúdo principal

Interview to Nidal El-sham of the Australian Communist Party


Interview carried out by Alavanca - Marxist-leninist Movement

Alavanca - About the origin of Israel. It is my understanding, from a bunch of sources, that the apartheid system of Zionist Jewish supremacists was already set up by the colonial administration of the British empire when historical Palestine was called the British mandate Palestine. The State under British colonial rule of Palestine was a so called democracy just for Jews and Palestinians non Jews were to be oppressed, segregated and enslaved. By that time already I think the idea of European imperialists and Zionist white Jews from Europe was that a white population, the Zionists, dominate the Arab Middle East and the oil fields and Suez canal for world trade.

Nidal El-Sham - The original plan was for 3 areas to be partitioned. One for the Zionists, second for the Palestinians, and a neutral zone for Jerusalem administered by the UN.

Alavanca - That explains why Israel is so completely intertwined with England and the United States, doesn't it?

Nidal El-Sham - That is correct, they owe them their existence in the beginning, and are intertwined within the British and American establishment, which is why they are immune to criticism by those governments.

Alavanca - People still talk of a war of independence of Israel. As if there was a fight against British mandate rule that was relevant. But the 1948 war was not against the British that left Palestine on their own will and it wasn't against Arab armies and a Palestinian army that were largely unprepared for war with the Zionist army, the main target of the Zionist army were unarmed Palestinian civilians to be killed or displaced. And therefore there was the nabka. Tell us about the nabka. Is the current genocide in Gaza a continuation of the nabka?

Nidal El-Sham - The Arab armies that invaded in 1948 outnumbered and had more arms then the Zionists, however were not coordinated and failed in their attacks. They also were untrained and most of them had never seen combat before. Once they withdrew, they left the Palestinians unprotected and the door was open for the displacement and murder of Palestinians. The Arab League then founded the PLO and it was under their control until the failure of the 1967 war, where after that the PLO organised independent of the Arab League for the first time. You are correct, the current genocide in Gaza is a continuation of the Nakba and the Greater Israel project of the Zionists.

Alavanca - I just read these news report. What you think of the fact that the Jolani Al Qaeda regime in Syria has arrested the leaders of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad just 48 hours after meeting Mahmoud Abbas head of the Palestinian Authority in his visit to Syria?

https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/pij-urges-interim-syrian-gov-t-to-free-activists-held-in-dam

Nidal El-Sham - Yeah I saw that, shows their true colours

Alavanca - This reinforces my impression that Wahabism and Zionism are the same in their position about Palestine.

Nidal El-Sham - The wahhabis are arresting resistance members to please the imperialists and lift sanctions off of Syria, however ISIS and its affiliates have never shown interest in the liberation of Palestine, only the murder of other Muslims and toppling of the governments of Muslim majority nations

Alavanca - Also I would like you to comment on this relation of the visit of the Palestinian Authority to Syria and the arrest of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad leaders 48 have later.

Nidal El-Sham - The PA is in bed with whoever will grant them power and authority, they’re walking the path Yasser Arafat rolled out. They know that they are very unpopular and are now willing to collaborate with whoever it may be to please the Zionists and hold on to their power. Similar to the relation between social democrats and fascists.

Comentários

Mensagens populares deste blogue

Crítica a Francisco Martins Rodrigues e à sua corrente ideológica - parte 1

Introdução à crítica a FMR e à sua corrente ideológica Nós achamos natural que muitos comunistas honestos - e temos encontrado alguns casos desses ultimamente - julguem positivamente Francisco Martins Rodrigues, numa leitura inicial do seu livro "Anti-Dimitrov", por ignorância e desconhecimento das verdadeiras ideias políticas e ideológicas deste ideólogo que deixou não apenas escritos das suas ideias mas também realmente uma corrente ideológica que ele próprio estruturou em vida e que continua a existir até hoje (em vários grupos políticos que existem em Portugal). E porque acreditamos que a apologia infundada e a ausência de crítica a Francisco Martins Rodrigues (FMR) vem da ignorância das suas ideias achamos melhor começar a nossa crítica anotando citações essenciais do seu pensamento (nos seus artigos essencialmente da revista Política Operária de 1985 em diante) que se pode resumir pelas suas próprias palavras a um "anti-stalinismo de esquerda". Estas citações ...

Why we support the one-state solution for Jews and Palestinian Arabs in Palestine and in the Zionist entity called Israel

Why we support the one-state solution for Jews and Palestinian Arabs in Palestine and in the Zionist entity called Israel We are communists of the Marxist-Leninist Movement Alavanca (Lever). And from this communist point of view we will explain our reasons for defending the one-state solution for Palestine with Jews and Arabs in the context of the national liberation struggle in Palestine that we consider inseparable from the socialist revolution in Palestine and in the world that is our strategic objective. Historical reasons from the past: The fair assessment of the two-state solution for Jews and Palestinian Arabs is that this solution has repeatedly and systematically failed since the creation of the so-called State of Israel in 1948. In 1947 the Soviet Union prepared a plan, which also had the support of the United States and the capitalist countries of Western Europe, to divide Palestine in half between Jews and Palestinian Arabs. In 1948, Zionist Jews created Israel by killing a...

Crítica a Francisco Martins Rodrigues e à sua corrente ideológica - parte 2

Toda a história dos partidos comunistas deve ser deitada ao lixo segundo Francisco Martins Rodrigues (FMR) FMR em "A Internacional Comunista na Europa"(2004): "Pode assim dizer-se, em balanço final, que a acumulação de forças promovida primeiro, na passagem do século, pelos partidos social-democratas, depois pelos partidos comunistas europeus, foi uma acumulação reformista, negativa do ponto de vista da revolução. O proletariado melhorou a sua condição material, elevou a sua capacidade organizativa, mas não avançou um passo no caminho da subversão da ordem do capital. Foi uma evolução geral, regular, inelutável, que não pode ser atribuída a esta ou àquela circunstância, às manobras geoestratégicas defensivas de Staline, ou às propensões reformistas de um Thorez ou um Togliatti. Tudo se passou como se não houvesse alternativa ao fracasso do projecto comunista na Europa." Fonte da citação: Marxist Internet Archive Aquilo em que FMR acertou Podemos reconhecer que Franc...